1) Real GDP Per Person: Canada vs G7
Index (2014 = 100). Canada compared to G7 average and U.S.
Source [W1]
Mission: give Canadians one plain-English, source-backed page to compare the main federal parties across the big files: cost of living, housing, health, drugs, crime, immigration, energy, trade, defence, and budget discipline. This page uses a Canada-first lens: affordability, sovereignty, productivity, safety, and execution. If a party does not clearly state a position in its own current documents, that gap is marked as a risk.
Baseline numbers from official federal sources before party spin (latest available years vary by dataset).
Index (2014 = 100). Canada compared to G7 average and U.S.
Source [W1]
Real GDP per person growth from 2014 to 2024.
Source [W1]
Age 15+, index (2014 = 100). Shows whether jobs kept pace with population growth.
Source [S5]
Annual net change, Canada. Positive means net additions; negative means net reduction.
Source [S6]
Current prices, Canada (% of GDP). Lower share means less business investment weight in the economy.
Source [S2]
Mobile tip: swipe left and right to read all party columns.
| Topics | Liberal Party of Canada | Conservative Party of Canada | New Democratic Party (NDP) | Green Party of Canada | Bloc Quebecois |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of living and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
| Housing affordability and supply | Promises to bring back direct federal homebuilding through Build Canada Homes, with major financing for prefab and affordable projects plus faster approvals. [L1] | Promises 2.3 million homes in 5 years, ties city funding to permit performance, and plans federal land/building sales for housing. [C1] | Promises 3 million homes by 2030, pushes rent-control/renter protections, and links federal funding to zoning and build-speed reforms. [N2] [N4] | Calls housing a national emergency, targets 1.2 million permanently affordable non-market homes in 7 years, and tightens anti-speculation rules. [G1] | Wants housing funds transferred to Quebec, pushes a stricter affordability definition, and seeks to raise non-market housing share to 20%. [B1] |
| Health care and family doctors | Promises to defend public care, expand doctor supply (training plus foreign credential pathways), and invest in hospitals, clinics, and youth mental health. [L1] | Promises to keep public-care framing and current transfers, launch national credentialing, and add 15,000 doctors by 2030. [C1] | Promises a family doctor for everyone by 2030, with faster licensing routes for internationally trained doctors and reduced admin burden. [N3] | Expands public delivery, makes mental health fully insured, and plans major staffing additions in primary care and long-term care. [G1] | Seeks federal transfers covering 35% of system costs and wants Quebec to administer federal dental funding directly. [B1] |
| Drug epidemic (overdoses, fentanyl) | Promises $500M for emergency treatment and overdose response, while also promising stronger anti-fentanyl enforcement at borders and through prosecutions. [L1] | Recovery-plus-enforcement model: promises a 50,000 recovery target, ending current federal safe-supply approach, site restrictions, and life sentences for fentanyl trafficking. [C1] | Official party policy supports harm reduction and public health coverage for substance-use care. Risk flag: in this source set there is no single detailed 2025 fentanyl-enforcement blueprint, which makes implementation harder to judge. [N7] | Strongly health-led: expanded supervised consumption/harm reduction, full personal-possession decriminalization, and federally managed safe supply. [G1] | Calls fentanyl first a public-health crisis but still supports tighter anti-smuggling and organized-crime action. [B1] |
| Crime and public safety | Promises more RCMP/CBSA staffing and tools, with emphasis on organized crime, trafficking, and border interdiction. [L1] | Promises a tough-sentencing model (including three-strikes and jail-not-bail framing) with expanded penalties for serious crime and trafficking. [C1] | Focuses on prevention, rehabilitation, and community-based safety; also supports better coordination against organized and gang crime. [N7] | Leans toward restorative justice, reduced over-incarceration, and stricter police oversight standards. [G1] | Pushes stronger border governance, more inspection and policing resources, and tougher anti-smuggling/money-laundering enforcement. [B1] |
| Immigration levels and integration | Promises to cap temporary workers/students below 5% of population by end-2027 and keep permanent admissions below 1% beyond 2027. [L1] | Promises to sharply reduce temporary streams and keep population growth below housing/job/health-system growth capacity. [C1] | Policy book prioritizes permanent immigration and sets a 1% annual level; recent Quebec commitments focus on integration support. Risk flag: no single updated national 2025 immigration platform is linked in the cited NDP sources. [N6] [N7] | Says immigration must match real capacity, with faster processing/integration support and tougher student financial rules. [G1] | Wants Quebec control over immigration powers and levels tied to reception capacity, plus tighter asylum process rules. [B1] |
| Energy, climate, and resource development | Promises to legislate repeal of consumer carbon pricing while keeping industrial pricing architecture. Record check: as of March 26, 2026, federal fuel-charge rates are set to $0, while federal OBPS industrial pricing is active at $110 for each excess tonne in 2026. [L1] [P1] [E2] [F1] [O1] | Promises to repeal carbon pricing framework and roll back key federal constraints while expanding pipelines, LNG, and major resource projects. [C1] | Policy supports binding emissions targets, carbon-market tools, cleaner energy buildout, and ending fossil-fuel tax breaks/subsidies. [N7] | Most aggressive transition plan: no new pipeline/oil/gas development, fossil phaseout timeline, renewable-electricity targets, and rising carbon pricing. [G1] | Supports carbon pricing and border adjustment, pushes an oil-and-gas emissions cap, and calls for ending fossil-fuel subsidies. [B1] |
| Trade, industry, and sovereignty | Promises interprovincial free-trade cleanup, new export financing, and market diversification beyond U.S. dependence. [L1] | Promises fast internal-trade barrier cuts, Buy Canada procurement, and external diversification including CANZUK-style alignment. [C1] | Calls for stronger non-U.S. trade links with labour-rights conditions and fewer internal barriers while maintaining safety/worker standards. [N1] [N7] | Frames trade as sovereignty policy: reduce U.S. dependence, prioritize Buy Canadian supply chains, and use taxes/tariffs strategically. [G1] | Supports targeted counter-tariffs, local-procurement rules, and diversification to Europe/Pacific while defending Quebec jurisdiction. [B1] |
| Defence and national security | Promises rapid military reinvestment, says NATO 2% target will be exceeded before 2030, and adds major defence spending commitments. [L1] | Promises NATO 2% by 2030, force expansion, stronger Arctic posture, and faster procurement. [C1] | Policy emphasizes sovereignty and Arctic defence with UN-focused peacebuilding priorities. Risk flag: limited current 2025 detail on procurement scale/timelines in cited NDP documents. [N7] | Seeks doctrine reset, stronger Arctic/coastal/cyber posture, and cancellation of the current F-35 path in favor of other options. [G1] | Supports reaching 2% of GDP defence spending before end of next legislature, with Quebec-linked industrial participation goals. [B1] |
| Budget discipline and execution clarity | States an operating-budget balance target by 2028 and debt-to-GDP decline while protecting transfers and major social programs. [L1] | Uses one-for-one spending-law framing and publishes a multi-year fiscal table attached to platform measures. [C1] | In this source set, commitments are spread across issue pages plus a policy book, not one full 2025 national costed platform document. Risk flag: split documents make apples-to-apples fiscal testing harder for voters. [N1] [N2] [N3] [N4] [N5] [N6] [N7] | Platform is broad and specific on policy actions but not presented as a simple four-year federal budget framework in the cited document. Risk flag: hard to quickly compare full fiscal path against other parties. [G1] | Platform is detailed on policy asks but primarily structured around Quebec transfer/authority demands rather than a full federal fiscal blueprint. Risk flag: less direct visibility on Canada-wide federal trade-offs. [B1] |
Based on the data and what each party says it will do, this is a Canada-first logical ranking for affordability, productivity, safety, sovereignty, and quality of life.
| Key Aspect (Score 1-10) | Liberal | Conservative | NDP | Green | Bloc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of living and taxes [L1] [C1] [N5] [G1] [B1] | 4 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Housing affordability and supply [L1] [C1] [N2] [N4] [G1] [B1] | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Jobs, investment, and productivity focus [S2] [S5] [W1] | 3 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Measured economic outcomes vs peers since 2014 [W1] [S2] [S5] | 2 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Energy and resource development [L1] [C1] [N7] [G1] [B1] | 4 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Immigration pace and integration capacity [L1] [C1] [N6] [N7] [G1] [B1] [S6] | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Crime, drugs, and public safety execution [L1] [C1] [N7] [G1] [B1] | 4 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Trade realism and sovereignty [S1] [L1] [C1] [N1] [G1] [B1] | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Budget discipline and national execution clarity [L1] [C1] [N1] [N7] [G1] [B1] | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Implementation detail and cost transparency [L1] [C1] [N1] [N2] [N3] [N4] [N5] [N6] [N7] [G1] [B1] | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Total (out of 100) | 42 | 78 | 42 | 31 | 39 |
Scoring model (100-point total): 10 aspects x 10 points each. The same fixed checklist is applied to every party.
Baseline numbers used for fit checks: Canada real GDP per person index is 101.8 vs G7 average 109.4 and U.S. 119.8 (2014=100, 2024); business investment share of GDP fell from 20.58% to 18.83% (2014 to 2024); employment rate fell 61.5% to 60.8% and participation fell 66.2% to 65.3% (2014 to 2025); U.S. share of Canada goods exports is 72.53% vs EU 5.47% (2025); net NPR change swung from +789,106 (2023) to -461,688 (2025). [W1] [S2] [S5] [S1] [S6]
Used for on this page: luxury-tax controversy claim. Check section 9 (threshold amounts) and section 34 (the "lesser of" tax formula used in this page).
NY.GDP.PCAP.KD, G7 set (CAN, USA, GBR, DEU, FRA, ITA, JPN), years 2014-2024:
https://api.worldbank.org/v2/country/CAN;USA;GBR;DEU;FRA;ITA;JPN/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD?format=json&date=2014:2024&per_page=300
Clarification: API metadata last-updated date is February 24, 2026, but the latest non-null year in this indicator for all G7 countries is 2024.
Method note: this page summarizes explicit commitments in each party's cited official documents. Wording uses "promises/proposes" for platform commitments and "record check" where enacted federal law or regulation is referenced. "Canada Reality Check" metrics use the latest available values in the cited federal datasets as of March 26, 2026.
GEO=Canada, Basis=Customs, Seasonal adjustment=Unadjusted, and REF_DATE in 2025. Sum VALUE across months by partner and trade type, then divide partner totals by All countries totals to get shares and ratios.GEO=Canada, choose Prices=Chained (2017) dollars for real growth and Prices=Current prices for investment-share calculations. Compare VALUE between 2015 and 2024 for the selected estimate rows.Age group=All ages, Gender=Total - gender) from [S4] for the same year.GEO=Canada, then compare REF_DATE=2016-01 versus 2026-01.GEO=Canada, Gender=Total - Gender, pick the relevant Age group and Labour force characteristics, then compare 2015 and 2025 values.GEO=Canada. Sum quarterly values by calendar year for each component, then sum 2006-2015 and 2016-2025 totals. For peak-year values, scan annual totals and take the maximum.GEO=Canada, Seasonal adjustment=Seasonally adjusted at annual rates, Prices=Chained (2017) dollars, and the selected NAICS industry row. Average the 12 monthly values for each year and compare year averages.(year value / 2014 value) * 100. Note: metadata can show a 2026 refresh date even when 2025/2026 annual values are still null; this chart uses the latest published non-null year (2024).